Introduction to Powder X-ray Diffractometry I: Overview

Keigo Nagao

Summer 2020, Volume 36, No. 2 , 19-24

Until the late 2000s, only scintillation counters (SC) were used as the detectors for general-purpose powder X-ray diffractometers. Thereafter, the core technologies that combine to create an X-ray diffractometer evolved dramatically. A one-dimensional (1D) detector—and subsequently a two-dimensional (2D) detector—came on the market, followed by new optical devices such as multilayer mirrors, in which layering technologies of super-thin film were applied. Analysis software functionality also improved remarkably. For instance, in addition to calculating crystallite size and lattice constants, programs implemented new algorithms and parameters, such as the application of whole pattern fitting, the Fundamental Parameter (FP) method, consideration of anisotropy and distribution in crystallite size.

The 1D and 2D measurement conditions described below are somewhat different from those with an SC.  The factors to which we should pay attention have changed when thinking about the optimal conditions to obtain high-quality data. Even in references in which only measurements using the focusing method and a zero-dimensional detector were described, useful hints to obtain high-quality data were rarely discussed. For this reason, in the series of articles making up this basic powder XRD course, we will explain the fundamentals of X-ray diffraction and expertise, sprinkled with the latest applications.

In this overview article, the principles and instruments used in the powder X-ray diffraction method, and what experiments can evaluate, are explained.
 

Highlights

  • Powder XRD identifies crystalline phases by using diffraction peak positions and intensities, so it can distinguish materials with the same chemical formula but different crystal structures.
  • Modern powder diffractometers have advanced far beyond scintillation-counter systems, with 1D and 2D detectors, improved optics, and more capable analysis software.
  • Powder XRD is non-destructive, requires relatively simple sample preparation, and measures average information over the irradiated region.
  • In addition to phase identification, powder XRD can be used for quantitative analysis, crystallinity, crystallite size and lattice strain, crystal structure refinement, in-situ analysis, texture, residual stress, PDF analysis, and particle or pore size analysis.
  • For routine powder work, 1D detection has effectively become the standard because it provides much higher intensity than 0D detection while maintaining strong angular resolution; 2D detection adds direct visualization of Debye rings and sample effects such as preferred orientation and coarse grains.

Summary

Powder X-ray diffractometry, or powder XRD, is a technique used to learn what crystalline materials are present in a sample and to get structural information from them. It works because X-rays interact with regularly spaced atomic planes in crystals. When the spacing and angle satisfy Bragg’s condition, the X-rays reinforce one another and produce diffraction peaks at specific angles. Those peak positions and shapes carry information about the material.

This makes powder XRD especially useful for telling apart substances that may have the same chemistry but different crystal structures. It can also identify mixtures, such as different oxides and hydroxides in rust. Because the method is non-destructive and usually does not require difficult sample preparation, it is widely used for both powders and many bulk materials.

A powder diffractometer has three main parts: the X-ray source, the goniometer that controls geometry, and the detector that records the diffracted X-rays. Instrument performance depends strongly on the optics and detector type. Modern systems may use parallel, divergent, or convergent beam optics, depending on whether the measurement is done in reflection or transmission geometry and what kind of sample is being studied.

Detector design matters a lot. Older 0D detection collects intensity point by point. A 1D detector collects data much more efficiently and is now the standard for powder measurements because it gives higher intensity and good resolution. A 2D detector captures a broader portion of the diffraction pattern at once, making it easier to observe ring patterns and recognize effects like preferred orientation or coarse grains.

Powder XRD is not limited to simple phase identification. It can also estimate how much of each phase is present, evaluate crystallinity, measure crystallite size and strain, refine crystal structures, study materials during heating or other changing conditions, and analyze texture or residual stress. The best choice of measurement setup depends on the sample type and the question being asked.

Frequently asked questions

Powder XRD can do much more than identify compounds. It can quantify phase amounts, estimate the ratio of crystalline to amorphous material, evaluate crystallite size and lattice strain, refine crystal structures by methods such as Rietveld analysis, perform in-situ measurements under changing conditions, analyze preferred orientation, measure residual stress, and support PDF analysis for local atomic arrangements. It can also be used for particle or pore size analysis through small-angle scattering-related methods.

Materials with the same chemical composition can still have different crystal structures, and crystal structure determines the diffraction pattern. Diamond and graphite are both carbon, and rutile and anatase are both TiO2, but their atomic arrangements differ. Because diffraction peak positions and intensities depend on the lattice spacing and atomic arrangement, their patterns are different enough to tell them apart.

The method is non-destructive, so the sample can often be used again for other analyses. It can usually be done in air, which makes sample preparation straightforward. It also gives average information over the irradiated part of the sample rather than only a tiny local spot, which is useful when you want a representative picture of the material. These features make powder XRD practical for a wide range of industrial and research applications.

A typical diffractometer has an X-ray generator on the incident side, a goniometer that controls the geometry between source, sample, and detector, and a detector on the receiving side. Many modern systems keep the sample horizontal, which helps when measuring powders, liquids, gels, or bulk samples that are difficult to hold securely. The system can also accept attachments that expand its measurement capabilities for specialized studies.

A 0D detector records intensity at one position at a time and typically needs a receiving slit to get proper angular resolution. A 1D detector has many strip-shaped sensing elements, so it can collect data across a range more efficiently and usually gives much higher intensity than 0D measurement while preserving high angular resolution. A 2D detector uses a matrix of pixels and captures a much wider portion of the diffraction pattern, which helps reveal Debye rings directly and makes sample features like preferred orientation or coarse grain effects easier to see.

The optics determine how the X-ray beam reaches the sample and strongly affect data quality. Different beam configurations such as parallel, divergent, and convergent beams are suited to different purposes. Parallel beam optics can be used for both reflection and transmission measurements, divergent beams are mainly used in reflection, and convergent beams are used in transmission. Matching the radiation and optics to the measurement goal is important for collecting high-quality data.

1D detection provides a strong balance of speed, intensity, and resolution. Because the detector already contains positional information in the 2-theta direction, it does not need the same slit-based limitation used in 0D systems. That leads to much higher collected intensity, often tens of times greater in principle, while maintaining a narrow effective peak width. For routine powder diffraction, this makes 1D systems especially efficient and practical.

Not always. Quantitative analysis is most reliable when multiple phases are present in a powdered sample, because the material is more uniformly represented in the irradiated volume. Bulk samples can also be quantified if the phases are distributed uniformly within the X-ray penetration depth. However, if the sample has a layered structure, phases nearer the surface can appear overrepresented because of X-ray absorption effects. In bulk materials, texture and residual stress are often especially important evaluation targets.

Related products

Subscribe to the Bridge newsletter

Stay up to date with materials analysis news and upcoming conferences, webinars and podcasts, as well as learning new analytical techniques and applications.

Contact Us

Whether you're interested in getting a quote, want a demo, need technical support, or simply have a question, we're here to help.