Best Practice of Capillary Transmission XRD

This is a written summary of a live webinar presented on September 4, 2025. The recording and resources are available on the recording page.
Presented by:
.jpg?width=875&height=990&name=Mardegan_picture_Fev2020%20(2).jpg)
Webinar summary
The webinar provides a detailed overview of why and how capillaries can be advantageous in certain contexts. Jose began by outlining the practical reasons to consider capillaries instead of traditional reflection setups. Capillaries are especially useful for air-sensitive, toxic, or reactive samples since they can be sealed to maintain a controlled atmosphere. They also reduce direct handling, minimize sample loss during preparation, and require less material than standard flat-plate holders. Another key benefit is the cleaner background they provide, since sample holders themselves often contribute interfering signals. By spinning the capillary during measurement, preferred orientation effects are reduced, improving the reliability of the data. In addition, capillaries allow for flexibility, including temperature-dependent studies with cryogenic or heating attachments.
The webinar then revisited fundamental diffraction concepts, particularly Bragg’s law, to frame the discussion of transmission geometry. Unlike reflection, which probes the sample surface, transmission requires X-rays to pass through the sample, making careful control of optics essential. Jose highlighted how mirrors and beam-shaping components are used to generate either parallel or convergent beams, each with trade-offs between resolution and intensity. Parallel beams are versatile but may sacrifice sensitivity, while convergent beams, when focused at the detector, can significantly boost both intensity and resolution, particularly for capillary work. He emphasized the importance of adjusting incident slits to balance resolution and signal strength, showing practical examples of how slit width directly affects peak sharpness and counting statistics.
Attention was also given to detector technology, comparing traditional point detectors with modern 1D and 2D systems. He explained how finer pixel or stripe sizes improve resolution and how energy-discriminating detectors can suppress fluorescence, yielding cleaner data without the need to change X-ray sources. These improvements are especially valuable when working with samples containing elements that would otherwise generate high background signals.
Jose then turned to sample preparation, stressing the importance of grinding powders to fine particle sizes, typically below 10 µm, to ensure homogeneous filling of the capillary and avoid artifacts from large grains. Practical tips included the use of simple tools, such as an ultrasonic toothbrush, to aid loading without specialized equipment. He also addressed sealing methods, noting that while simple materials like plasticine or grease may suffice for routine work, more secure sealing with glues or thermal sealing is preferable for moisture- or air-sensitive materials.
Examples were presented to illustrate how capillary diameter and choice of radiation source must be matched to the type of sample. For light-element materials, larger capillaries can be used with copper radiation, yielding strong signals quickly. For heavy elements, smaller capillaries may be required to reduce absorption effects, though this makes preparation more challenging and sometimes necessitates longer scan times. Molybdenum radiation, with higher energy, was shown as an alternative for heavier samples, allowing larger capillary diameters and higher throughput.
Throughout the presentation, Jose stressed the interplay between beam optics, detector choice, counting statistics, and sample preparation. He provided rules of thumb, such as aiming for at least 3,000 counts in main peaks for reliable phase identification and 10,000 counts for quantitative analysis, and ensuring sufficient step sizes across peak widths for accurate Rietveld refinement. The session closed with a reminder that while transmission geometry and capillary use can appear complex compared to standard reflection setups, mastering a few practical adjustments leads to high-quality, reproducible data that expand the range of samples accessible to XRD users.
Key questions answered in the webinar
-
Capillary transmission XRD offers several significant advantages, particularly for challenging samples. Firstly, it allows for controlled atmosphere measurements, making it ideal for air-sensitive, toxic, or reactive materials by easily sealing the capillary. This also improves sample handling and transportation, preventing spillage and direct contact. Secondly, capillaries require much less sample material, which is crucial when working with limited quantities. Thirdly, they provide a cleaner background by minimizing interference from the sample holder, a common issue with organic compounds. While the capillary itself might contribute an amorphous background, this can often be mitigated by adjusting incident slits. Lastly, capillaries facilitate diverse experimental conditions, including temperature control (cooling with cryostats or heating) and significantly reducing preferred orientation by allowing the sample to be spun during measurement, ensuring crystallites are exposed in all directions for better data quality.
-
For transmission XRD, the incident beam optics play a crucial role in data quality. Traditional reflection XRD often uses a divergent beam, but transmission measurements benefit from either a parallel or convergent beam, which requires a mirror after the X-ray source. A parallel beam hits the sample uniformly. While resolution can be improved by decreasing the incident slit, this comes at the cost of intensity. A convergent beam, however, is designed to focus at the detector surface. This offers a significant advantage by providing both higher intensity and better resolution compared to a parallel beam for similar slit conditions. If a system is dedicated to capillary or foil transmission, a convergent beam is highly recommended. For labs with diverse applications (e.g., thin films, 2D mapping), a parallel beam might be more versatile, although having both options is ideal. Focusing the beam on the sample instead of the detector with a convergent setup would lead to a divergent beam after the sample, compromising both resolution and intensity, unless compensated by careful adjustment of receiving slits.
-
Achieving high-quality XRD data involves optimizing several factors:
- High background: This can be caused by sample fluorescence (e.g., iron content with copper radiation) or the sample holder (e.g., glass substrate). Solutions include changing the detector mode to suppress fluorescence, using a different X-ray source (e.g., cobalt for iron-rich samples), or using low-background sample holders.
- High noise & low intensity: Often due to short counting times or insufficient sample. Decrease scan speed (longer measurement time), optimize step size for better statistics, or use a larger capillary if sample amount allows.
- Poor reproducibility: Frequently linked to bad sample preparation, such as large grains, lack of sample spinning, or moisture absorption. Proper grinding, spinning the capillary during measurement, and sealing capillaries for air/moisture-sensitive samples are crucial.
- Bad resolution (Broad peaks): Can result from large step sizes, wide incident slits, or inherently poor sample crystallinity (small crystallite size). Adjusting step size and closing incident slits can improve resolution, but improving sample crystallinity through synthesis is also important. Aim for at least 3,000 counts for phase identification and 10,000 counts for quantification in the strongest peaks, with 5-10 data points across the full width at half maximum.
Ultimately, the goal is a diffractogram with high intensity, low background, excellent reproducibility, and sharp, well-resolved peaks.
-
Detector technology has significantly evolved, impacting XRD measurements:
- 0D detectors (Scintillator): These older detectors provide no position information on their surface, requiring a physical slit to be placed before them to achieve resolution. They essentially count X-rays at a single point as the detector scans.
- 1D detectors (Stripe): Representing an improvement, these detectors have multiple stripes (e.g., 75 or 100 µm wide), acting like multiple independent detectors. They provide position information in one direction, eliminating the need for a physical slit and offering better efficiency and speed.
- 2D detectors (Pixel): The latest advancement, 2D pixel detectors provide information in both scanning (2θ) and "beta" directions, allowing visualization of diffraction rings. Pixel sizes (e.g., 75 or 100 µm) influence resolution. Beyond smaller pixel size, energy resolution is a critical feature of advanced 2D detectors (e.g., 340 eV). High energy resolution dramatically improves the peak-to-background ratio by effectively suppressing fluorescence signals from the sample (e.g., iron with copper radiation), leading to cleaner data without needing to switch X-ray sources, thus saving cost and experimental time. The position of 2D detectors can also affect resolution; installing them vertically can provide higher 2θ angular range but might introduce defocusing effects if not properly corrected by software.
-
Effective sample preparation is key for high-quality capillary transmission XRD:
- Particle size: Grind the powder sample to a very fine particle size, ideally around 5-10 µm, to ensure homogeneous packing and minimize preferred orientation. Be cautious not to over-grind, as this can induce stress or alter sample phases. Sieving can help achieve a consistent particle size distribution.
- Filling the capillary: Simple vibration methods, like using an ultrasound toothbrush, can aid in uniformly loading the powder into the capillary. Avoid using metallic parts to push down stuck particles, as large grains can lead to strong, incorrect peaks and poor reproducibility. Remove any large grains and re-grind if necessary.
- Capillary diameter and material: The choice of capillary diameter depends on the X-ray radiation and the sample's atomic number (Z). For low-Z elements with copper radiation, a 0.3-0.4 mm capillary is suitable. For heavier elements or hard radiation like molybdenum, smaller capillaries (e.g., 0.3 mm) might be needed to allow X-rays to pass through, or larger ones (e.g., 0.5 mm) with moly radiation for stronger signals. Borosilicate glass capillaries are generally cheaper and suitable for most applications unless specific temperature or chemical resistance properties are required.
- Sealing: For air or moisture-sensitive samples, sealing the capillary is crucial. While play-doh or plasticine can prevent sample dropping, for true environmental control, glue or specific sealing methods are required. The type of glue should not interfere with the measurement or the sample holder's fit.
-
Specialized attachments and alignment procedures significantly improve the ease and quality of capillary transmission XRD:
- Standard capillary attachment (Goniometer head): This traditional attachment allows for precise alignment of the capillary and enables spinning (up to 120 RPM) to average crystallite orientations. It can also be combined with cryostats for temperature-dependent studies. However, manual alignment with a microscope can be time-consuming.
- Innovative capillary attachment (Pre-aligned holder): Newer, more user-friendly attachments feature pre-aligned capillary holders, eliminating the need for extensive manual alignment. The capillary is fixed horizontally, but still rotates. While they might require slightly longer capillaries, they can accommodate smaller capillaries with specific holders.
- Automated Z-alignment: Modern XRD software often includes automated Z-alignment routines using X-rays (not lasers) to precisely position the capillary at the correct height, simplifying the setup process for both standard and innovative attachments. This ensures the X-ray beam consistently hits the center of the capillary for optimal data collection.
-
Bragg's Law is a fundamental principle in X-ray Diffraction, described by the equation: nλ = 2d sinθ.
- n: An integer (order of diffraction).
- λ (lambda): Wavelength of the incident X-rays.
- d: Spacing between atomic planes in a crystal lattice (lattice plane spacing).
- θ (theta): Angle of incidence of the X-rays with the crystal planes.
This law explains how X-rays constructively interfere when they encounter the ordered atomic planes within a crystalline material. When Bragg's Law is satisfied, a maximum in X-ray intensity (a "peak") is observed in the diffractogram. By analyzing the positions (2θ angles) and intensities of these diffraction peaks from a powder sample in a capillary, researchers can extract a wealth of information:
- Crystal structure: The specific arrangement of atoms within the unit cell.
- Phase identification: Identifying the different crystalline compounds (phases) present in the sample.
- Lattice parameters: Determining the dimensions of the unit cell.
- Crystallinity: Assessing the ratio of crystalline to amorphous content, which indicates the quality of the sample.
- Compositional ratio: Quantifying the relative amounts of different phases in a mixture.
In essence, Bragg's Law is the mathematical foundation that allows us to interpret the diffraction patterns obtained from capillary transmission XRD to understand the atomic and molecular structure of materials.
-
For reliable results in capillary transmission XRD, specific peak intensity targets are recommended, typically referring to peak height (not counts per second):
- Phase identification: To confidently identify the different crystalline phases present in a sample, the main peaks should reach at least 3,000 counts. This threshold ensures sufficient statistical reliability for pattern matching.
- Quantification: For accurate quantification of the relative amounts of different phases within a sample, a higher intensity is required. The main peaks should ideally reach at least 10,000 counts. This provides the necessary statistical precision for quantitative analysis methods like Rietveld refinement.
To achieve these intensity levels, researchers often need to adjust the scan speed and step size. For instance, decreasing the scan speed and optimizing the step size will increase the measurement time, allowing more X-rays to be collected and thus boosting peak intensity and improving the signal-to-noise ratio. It is also recommended to have 5 to 10 data points above the full width at half maximum of the strongest reflections to ensure accurate peak shape analysis.

Subscribe to the Bridge newsletter
Stay up to date with materials analysis news and upcoming conferences, webinars and podcasts, as well as learning new analytical techniques and applications.

Contact Us
Whether you're interested in getting a quote, want a demo, need technical support, or simply have a question, we're here to help.