Analysis of S, Fe, Ni and V in Residual Oil According to IP610/13

Application Note WDXRF1104

Introduction 

Residual oil, which contains S, Fe, Ni, V and other elements, is obtained after distilling crude oil. It is used for marine fuel or electric power plant fuel. When residual oil is burned, some elements can cause damage to marine engines and the environment. For example, sulfur is considered the most harmful element causing air pollution, and metals like Ni, V and Fe are regarded as catalyst poisons, blocking a catalyst’s performance.  

XRF is a powerful tool for analyzing these elements in residual oil. Sample preparation is very simple and analysis results are obtained quickly.   

This application note demonstrates that ZSX Primus IVi is compliant with IP610/13 for the analysis of S, Fe, Ni and V. 

Instrument 

The ZSX Primus IVi, a tube-below sequential wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence (WDXRF) spectrometer, is optimized for the routine analyses that today’s petroleum laboratories need to perform. The optical chamber can be maintained under vacuum while the sample chamber is under helium atmosphere by using a vacuum seal between the optical chamber and the sample chamber. The vacuum seal minimizes helium gas consumption and reduces the time required for helium purge. The spectrometer is equipped with a 4 kW X-ray tube with an ultra-thin beryllium window or a 3 kW X-ray tube.

The operation software is designed for easy routine analysis. The quantitative analysis flowbar guides users step by step to generate applications. The sample ID table and program operation help operators carry out daily analysis. 

Sample and sample preparation 

Residual oil standard samples supplied by Analytical Services, Inc. were used for calibration. 

Eight grams of each residual oil sample was poured into a liquid cell (Chemplex® 1095). 3.6 μm thick Mylar® (Chemplex® 150) was used as the sample film. 

XRF1054 Figure 1 Oil sample cell

Figure 1:  Oil sample cell 

Measurement and calibration 

Measurements were performed on the ZSX Primus IVi with a high performance 4 kW Rh-target X-ray tube for S, Fe, Ni and V. Primary beam filters were used to protect the X-ray tube window in case of sample leakage. In addition, the filter reduces the background to improve the peak-to-background ratio. Measurement conditions are shown in Table 1. 

Table 1:  Measurement conditions

Element S Fe Ni V
Line
kV-mA 50-50 50-50 50-50 50-50
Primary filter Be30 Al125 Al125 Al25
Slit S4 S2 S2 S2
Crystal GeH LiF LiF LiF
Detector PC SC SC SC
Time Peak(s) 20 20 20 20
BG(s) 10x2 10x2 10x2 10x2

Note) LiF: LiF(200), PC: F-PC


The calibration curves were generated with a matrix correction applied to all the analytes. The correction coefficients used were calculated theoretically by the fundamental parameter (FP) method. The calibration results are listed in Table 2 and the calibration curves are shown in Figure 2. 

Table 2:  Calibration results 

Element unit Calibration range Accuracy
S mass% 0.165 – 5.51 0.014
Fe ppm 13 – 504 8.1
Ni ppm 2 – 101 1.0
V ppm 2 – 150 5.8

XRF1104 Figure 2 Calibration curves for residual oil

Figure 2:  Calibration curves for residual oil


The accuracy of linear calibration is calculated by the following formula:

$Accuracy = \sqrt{ \frac{\sum_i{(C_i-\hat{C}_i)^2}}{n-2} }$

$C_i$: calculated value of standard sample
$\hat{C}_i$: reference value of standard sample
n : number of standard samples. 

Analysis results 

Typical lower limits of detection (LLD) for Fe, Ni and V calculated using the standard sample with the lowest content by the following formula are shown in Table 3. 

$LLD = 3 \cdot \frac{x}{I_S} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{2 \cdot I_{BG}}{1000 \cdot t}}$

$x$: Standard value (ppm) 
$t$: Counting time for the peak (s) 
$I_S$: Net intensity (kcps) 
$I_{BG}$ : Background intensity (kcps) 

XRF1054 Figure 3 Net and background intensities

Figure 3:  Net and background intensities 


Table 3:  LLDs of Fe, Ni and V (t = 100 s) (unit: ppm) 

Element LLD
Fe 0.2
Ni 0.1
V 0.5

Repeatability tests for two samples (sample A and B) were carried out for 21 test portions according to “method A” of IP610-13. The test results are tabulated in Table 4, in which the differences between two successive aliquots are shown and “r” represents “repeatability” as defined in IP 610/13, which states that the difference between two successive test results obtained by the same operator with the same apparatus under constant operation conditions on identical test material would, in the normal and correct operation of the test method, exceed the value in Table 5, which lists the repeatability (r) of each analyte, in only one case in twenty. 
The test results shown in Table 4, where the difference between two successive aliquots does not exceed the repeatability (r) for each analyte, prove that the performance of the ZSX Primus IVi meets the requirement of ISO610-13 for S, Fe, Ni and V analysis.

Table 4:  Repeatability test results

(A) Sample A 

  S* Fe Ni V
  mass% ppm ppm ppm
  Result Diff. Result Diff. Result Diff. Result Diff.
1 0.170   12.9   49.3   259.8  
2 0.169 0.000 14.5 1.6 49.8 0.5 257.2 2.5
3 0.169 0.000 14.5 0.0 49.4 0.4 258.7 1.5
4 0.170 0.001 13.5 1.0 49.5 0.1 260.4 1.7
5 0.171 0.001 12.7 0.8 49.0 0.5 259.2 1.2
6 0.170 0.001 13.8 1.1 49.5 0.5 260.5 1.3
7 0.170 0.001 13.8 0.1 49.7 0.2 261.5 1.0
8 0.170 0.000 13.6 0.2 49.4 0.3 258.5 3.0
9 0.170 0.000 14.0 0.4 49.4 0.0 259.2 0.7
10 0.170 0.001 13.6 0.4 49.8 0.5 262.0 2.8
11 0.172 0.002 13.5 0.1 50.1 0.3 259.2 2.9
12 0.171 0.001 13.4 0.1 50.1 0.0 261.9 2.7
13 0.170 0.001 13.7 0.3 50.0 0.1 261.9 0.0
14 0.170 0.000 13.0 0.7 49.8 0.2 257.7 4.2
15 0.171 0.001 13.9 0.9 49.9 0.1 259.6 1.9
16 0.171 0.000 12.6 1.2 49.6 0.2 258.9 0.6
17 0.171 0.000 13.8 1.1 50.6 0.9 261.2 2.3
18 0.170 0.001 14.1 0.3 49.8 0.8 263.3 2.0
19 0.171 0.001 13.8 0.3 50.2 0.4 262.4 0.8
20 0.170 0.001 13.9 0.0 50.1 0.1 260.5 1.9
21 0.170 0.001 13.6 0.3 50.0 0.1 259.8 0.8
Max.   0.002   1.6   0.9   4.2
r   0.028   5.1   2.3   9.3
* Out of concentration range for repeatability test shown in Table 5

(B) Sample B 

  S Fe Ni V
  mass% ppm ppm ppm
  Result Diff. Result Diff. Result Diff. Result Diff.
1 2.01   203.6   39.5   117.9  
2 2.02 0.00 206.7 3.1 39.9 0.4 119.1 1.2
3 2.01 0.01 207.3 0.7 39.6 0.3 118.4 0.7
4 2.03 0.02 206.9 0.5 39.4 0.1 118.0 0.3
5 2.00 0.03 207.5 0.6 39.2 0.3 118.0 0.0
6 1.99 0.01 204.1 3.4 39.3 0.1 115.8 2.2
7 2.01 0.02 206.0 1.9 39.6 0.4 118.4 2.6
8 2.00 0.01 206.9 0.9 39.6 0.0 118.3 0.2
9 2.00 0.01 206.5 0.4 39.6 0.1 116.4 1.9
10 1.98 0.02 207.2 0.7 39.2 0.4 116.8 0.4
11 1.99 0.01 203.4 3.8 39.2 0.1 118.0 1.2
12 2.00 0.01 207.6 4.3 39.7 0.4 116.7 1.3
13 2.00 0.00 207.1 0.5 39.6 0.1 117.2 0.6
14 1.99 0.01 205.0 2.1 39.6 0.0 117.7 0.5
15 1.99 0.00 206.1 1.1 40.0 0.4 117.9 0.2
16 1.99 0.00 205.0 1.1 40.0 0.0 117.9 0.0
17 1.99 0.00 205.6 0.6 39.7 0.3 117.1 0.7
18 1.98 0.01 204.4 1.3 39.2 0.5 117.3 0.1
19 1.98 0.01 206.4 2.0 39.9 0.7 119.3 2.0
20 1.99 0.00 206.7 0.3 39.8 0.1 117.5 1.8
21 1.99 0.00 206.2 0.5 39.7 0.1 118.5 1.0
Max.   0.03   4.3   0.7   2.6
r   0.33   23.5   1.9   4.4

Table 5:  Repeatability defined in IP 610/13 METHOD A

Element Concentration range Repeatability [ ]
S 0.9274 mass% – 3.4015 mass% 0.1632 X
Fe 8.5 ppm – 243.7 ppm 0.09563 (X+40)
Ni 2.3 ppm – 86.3 ppm 0.03231 (X+20)
V 12.4 ppm – 363.9 ppm 0.03455 (X+10)

Conclusions 

Routine analysis of residual oil with high accuracy and precision can be easily performed on the ZSX Primus IVi. This application note demonstrates that the performance of the ZSX Primus IVi meets the requirements of IP 610/13 for the analysis of S, Fe, Ni and V. 

Reference 

IP 610/13; Determination of sulfur, vanadium, nickel, iron, calcium, zinc and phosphorous in residual fuel oil by wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry.

Contact Us

Whether you're interested in getting a quote, want a demo, need technical support, or simply have a question, we're here to help.